why corn and e85 suck.
alternative fuels, cars January 19th, 2008my buddy naim wrote a great article on why he hates e85 today and i felt like backing him up, but in a different way.
e85 is america’s response to bitching about gas prices. yeah, it’s $3. big deal. it’s actually cheaper than that stupid bottle of water you bought today, because you’re too good for tap water. what? don’t believe me. that bottle of aquafina you bought today probably cost $1.49 cents for 20 oz. 20 oz. of gas at $3.05 a gallon costs…wait for it…47 cents. you’re overpaying for your water (WHICH IS FREE) by a dollar. not amazing, a gallon of your bottled water (which is just filtered tap water if you’re buying aquafina or dasani) is $9.53!!!!!!
corn is the lifeblood of the american economy. sadly, u.s. corn subsidies destroy the world. (there is a correllation to u.s. corn subsidies and the destruction of the amazonian rain forest.*) between 1995 and 2004, the government spent $41.9 billion on corn subsidies. taxpayers paid that out of their pockets, to give to the american farmer. yay.
now, i recommend everyone see king corn, which is basically a movie about corn in america. note, most of the corn you see on the side of the road is produced as feed for livestock, and not for human consumption.
now, some of our corn is going to produce ethanol. great, except that using corn for ethanol now makes the supply of corn used for corn-based products such as high fructose corn syrup (which is in everything) go down, making prices go up. allegedly, if the price of high fructose corn syrup were to go up just 1/10th of a cent, it would cost coca-cola $125 million dollars.
corn based ethanol takes a lot of energy to make. in fact, more fossil fuels are burned to create ethanol from corn, than the resulting energy contained in the ethanol. what this means…is that ethanol is NOT renewable. corn itself is renewable, but the process by which it is converted to ethanol is not renewable. we’ll spend more energy than we get, and eventually, we’ll run out of the energy to create ethanol.
sugarcane is a much better source for ethanol, or beets, or switchgrass. but our subsidies, environment and tariffs on imported sugar make growing or importing these things either really expensive, or just not a value proposition for a farmer, who could just grow corn, and always get the government to pay for a large portion of their crop. the government does pay for farmers to grow switchgrass.
anyway, corn based ethanol is a killer. in the end, as naim says, ethanol is a crappy stop-gap to solve the energy crisis. only more efficient energy equations will create a truly renewable energy source. but really, we just need more nuclear power plants.
*u.s. farmers stopped planting soy in lieu of planting corn to collect government subsidies. supply of soy dropped tremendously, causing the price of soy to jump. brazilian’s have taken the opportunity to exploit the mass expanse of land they have tied up in rain forests, to plant soy.
January 20th, 2008 at 9:59 am
How do you feel about Hybrid technology? I know Ford has a couple of Hybrids.
January 20th, 2008 at 9:44 pm
Hybrid technology is a great bridging technology between internal combustion and X, where X is whatever is the next big thing. Right now, consumers know hybrids as “gas-electric” but I will not be surprised if we begin to see, “diesel-electric”, “hydrogen-electric”, etc. Gas-Electric hybrids offer good fuel economy and better emissions than most regular models. They also address a fundamental concern of mine, which is making an internal combustion engine vehicle more efficient (by capturing some energy which is wasted when the car is not moving, or braking)
I strongly believe that in the future, until we figure out what X is (whether that’s hydrogen fuel cell, or batteries, or something different) all vehicles will be a type of hybrid using two different power sources to drive the wheels.
I’m going to write a post on this subject, because I feel strongly on it too! Thanks for the comment
January 21st, 2008 at 1:07 pm
Great post. Thanks for the props. I’ll definitely be referring back to this for some of my criticisms of corn based E85 in part 2 (which is in the works).